Showing posts with label chaotic market. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chaotic market. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

ETH Zurich Workshop Presentation: A Financial Market Bifurcation Parameter



Can financial market crises be predicted? We propose a Bifurcation Parameter in this regard.


BACKGROUND: Weidlich proposes the Ising Model to describe polarization of opinions in social groups. Haken's model includes the Langevin equation of Brownian motion as a special case and references Weidlich's work as an example of more ordered states in social systems. Vaga applies Weidlich and Haken's state transition concepts to formulate the Coherent Market Hypothesis. Vaga and Nawrocki develop a novel bifurcation parameter and analyze coherent, chaotic, efficient and disordered (crisis) market states.


The Coherent Market Hypothesis provides the theoretical basis for defining a quantitative bifurcation parameter, a potential indicator crisis situations in the financial markets.


The empirical daily conditional return map from 1929 to present illustrates bullish and bearish equilibrium states (where the return map crosses zero). The slope of the conditional return map in the neighborhood of moderate returns is positive with high statistical significance.


The slope of the conditional return (CR) map governs the bifurcation process from the linear, disordered state to the more structured bull and bear states.


The bifurcation parameter is the 200 day sum of conditional returns after moderate positive returns minus the 200 day sum of conditional returns after moderate negative returns. This parameter is related to the slope of the CR map.


The Bifurcation Parameter (BP) has dropped well below -10% in crisis markets such the Crash of 1929 and Great Depression Era. In contrast, the BP didn't drop below -10% at all in the post WW II Era (1946-1975). Since the advent of computerized trading and negotiated commissions in the mid-1970s, the BP has indicated a more efficient market, though recently this indicator has fallen to levels not seen since the Great Depression Era.


In the 1929 to 1939 period, the bifurcation parameter fell well below -10% and remained there on three occasions, each of which resulted in significant market declines


In the 1999 to 2009 period there were two large declines in the Bifurcation Parameter below -10%, one coincided with rising stock prices and the other with a large decline to date.


Periods with a negative BP have a significant negative bias in the conditional return map.


Periods with a BP greater than +10% have a higher degree of bull and bear trend persistence.


Market state definitions can be based solely on the Bifurcation Parameter.


Ordered markets, including both coherent and chaotic states, outperform efficient market periods, while disordered (crisis) markets have underperformed by a large degree.


Ordered markets can be decomposed into coherent bull markets (when the prior day return is >0) or chaotic markets when the prior day return is negative.


Coherent, chaotic, efficient and crisis markets have widely varying risk and reward profiles.


The Crash of 1929 and Great Depression Era was highly volatile.


The post World War II Era enjoyed a high degree of trend persistent, coherent and chaotic markets.


Since the advent of negotiated commissions in 1975, the markets have become more efficient on average.


Returns in coherent and chaotic markets are highly statistically significant. Disordered markets (mean regressive reversals after positive returns) are also statistically significant. However due to the high volatility and relatively limited amount of data, crisis market returns are only significant to the 90% level.


The Bifurcation Parameter provides a statistically significant indicator of the coherent and chaotic market states predicted by the Coherent Market Hypothesis. However, due to the extreme volatility and limited number of crisis markets the significance of this state has only been partially established, i.e. reversals of prior day price advances.




BACKUP CHARTS



The NASDAQ Composite Index exhibited a high degree of coherence from 1971 through the year 2000. It is currently in a disordered state.



The S&P500 Index has exhibited large upside reversals in the recent mean regressive market.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Over Reaction, Disordered Market Continues


We introduce an Efficient Market state, defined as -10% < Bifurcation Parameter < +10%. This represents a market where there isn't much over reaction or under reaction to news. We also update prior coherent and chaotic market state definitions, requiring the Bifurcation Parameter to be >= +10%. Therefore the Coherent and Chaotic markets clearly represent under reaction situations and trend persistent states. We also use the prior day return, R(t) to differentiate between coherent (R(t)>=0) and chaotic (R(t)<0) states. These definitions and associated risk and returns since July 1929 are summmarized as follows:

Coherent Bull Markets
Bifurcation Parameter >= +10%
R(t) >= 0 (prior day return is positive)
RETURN 37.94%
RISK 15.05%
% TIME 24.16%

Efficient Markets
-10% < Bifurcation Parameter < +10%
RETURN 6.16%
RISK 14.85%
% TIME 45.25%

Chaotic Markets
Bifurcation Parameter > +10%
R(t) < 0 (prior day return is negative)
RETURN -13.50%
RISK 17.87%
% TIME 22.15%

Disordered Markets
Bifurcation Parameter < -10%
RETURN -17.17%
RISK 36.65%
% TIME 8.43%

Thursday, April 2, 2009

CURRENT MARKET: DISORDERED STATE


(click on image to expand)

During the past 12 months the Dow Industrials have had an even lower return and higher risk than the average for prior extremely disordered markets. The high volatility of extremely disordered markets includes large swings both up and down. While the stimulus and bailout programs should provide the credit necessary to eventually restore normal market structure, so far the quantitative evidence is consistent with a disordered market state.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Nonlinear and Chaotic Dynamics and its Application to Historical Financial Markets

Hartmut Kiehling*

For complete article click here.

Abstract: For roughly 15 years, economic research has been involved with chaotic systems. During these years chaos theory took a firm place in science, although the enthusiasm of the first decade was followed by a more subdued kind of consideration. This might be the time to sum up some of the results and to develop some ideas concerning possible applications of chaos theory to economic history (and its theory). Since a good portion of the chaos research that has been done until now deals with financial markets, we will consider that section of economics.

* Address all communications to Hartmut Kiehling, Heerstraße 9, D-81247 München,
Tel. +49-(0)89-8116379, Fax. +49-(0)89-8110189, e-mail: 101520.2007@compu-serve.com, 0898110189@t-online.de.

T. Vaga published his Coherent Market Hypothesis as a nonlinear statistical model. He distinguishes four market phases: random walk, transition, chaotic markets, and coherent markets. Each one is characterized by different kinds of attitudes and the mutual influence of investors. The model follows the psychological theory of social imitation, but is formulated mathematically. 15

Friday, June 27, 2008

An Overreaction Implementation of the Coherent Market Hypothesis and Option Pricing

RAINER SCHOEBEL
University of Tuebingen - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
JOCHEN VEITH
University of Tuebingen - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration


Inspired by the theory of social imitation (Weidlich 1970) and its adaptation to financial markets by the Coherent Market Hypothesis (Vaga 1990), we present a behavioral model of stock prices that supports the overreaction hypothesis. Using our dynamic stock price model, we develop a two factor general equilibrium model for pricing derivative securities. The two factors of our model are the stock price and a market polarization variable which determines the level of overreaction. We consider three kinds of market scenarios: Risk-neutral investors, representative Bernoulli investors and myopic Bernoulli investors. In case of the latter two, risk premia provide that herding as well as contrarian investor behaviour may be rationally explained and justified in equilibrium. Applying Monte Carlo methods, we examine the pricing of European call options. We show that option prices depend significantly on the level of overreaction, regardless of prevailing risk preferences: Downward overreaction leads to high option prices and upward overreaction results in low option prices.